GP Tuition - GP Tuition Bishan - Slider 1

GP Tuition

Fake News,
Censorship,
Freedom of Speech

What can you learn from our GP Tuition?

Our GP Tuition takes pride in nurturing our students to become inquisitive minds, who are capable of mature thinking and an expansive knowledge base. With GP Tuition, you will find support and expertise in the content and essay field to prepare you for the GCE A Level examination.

Our exclusive and in-house designed GP notes help students to stay current with the ever evolving news while reaching deep into past content base. On the other hand, our GP tutors impart GP essay writing skills to raise the competency to form persuasive and logical arguments. Accompanied with comprehension answering techniques, students will find themselves in control of content analysis and linguistics mastery.

GP Tuition programme

At our GP Tuition programme, we ensure content development amongst our students such that they have a broad range of knowledge on all topics. Lessons are conducted by GP tutor Simon Ng who excel in identifying students’ problems and instilling proper habits. ‘Practice makes perfect’, a discipline encompassed in our lessons, which aims at drilling students with complex questionnaires to the point of familiarity, hence conditioning them for tough exams ahead.

You can look up our class schedule as shown below.

GP Tuition Logo - Generalpaper.com.sg

J1 and J2 GP Tuition Workshop (Nov-Dec 2018)

Our GP Tuition will prepare JC1 and JC2 students through the discussion and application of GP issue-based knowledge to be proficient in answering GP essays and comprehension questions.

Economics Tuition Logo - Economics Focus

J2 Economics Tuition Workshop (Nov-Dec 2018)

Enrich your learning and grasp A Level Economics concepts well at our economics tuition lessons by attending our topical re-teaching and skills development for CSQ and essay writing.

Experience academic progression

Sign up now at General Paper Tuition!

How the issue on censorship
is discussed in our GP Tuition?

As part of our efforts to help JC students in Singapore, our GP tuition programme will focus on the debate and discussion on certain issues that will be tested at the GCE A Level examination. For this month, the debate is on the topic of censorship.

On this issue of censorship, we encourage discussions of different angles and perspectives from our students during GP Tuition. These angle of discussion range from individual, social, economic and political issues to user, corporate and government perspectives. Such fluidity in the discussion level raises the maturity and capability of a student’s thinking, thereby expediting their academic growth.

GP Tuition - GP Tuition Bishan - Icon 2

Is censorship necessary in our modern society?

To some, censorship poses a threat to modern ideological structures while to others, censorship is necessary to reduce noise from afflicting the modern society.

Introduction
Censorship has always been criticized by liberals as the violation of the rights of the individuals as it is seen as a measure that undermines freedom of speech. However, as our society becomes more complex, the result of higher degree of institutionalization and integration of diverse communities while the modern media technology advances, there is a call for the re-examination of the requirement of censorship to ensure that the detrimental effects of the mass media will not occur to undermine the development of a civil society. Therefore, it is indisputable to agree that censorship has become increasingly necessary in today’s world.

Main Body
For detractors who are against censorship, they would not agree that censorship is needed in the modern society despite the growing negative influences it imposes on the society as it is seen as a restriction of the freedom of speech. To them, it is imperative for the society to uphold freedom of speech as it is the fundamental right of any individuals in a democratic nation. Furthermore, the imposition of censorship is a complex notion to introduce due to the complexity in setting the yardstick as there are diverse opinions on this matter, especially in modern societies where multiculturalism is the explanation for the complexity.

Nonetheless, such an argument is questionable. In reality, the notion of freedom of speech we uphold faithfully does not benefit the interests of the masses, but only for the interest of the owners and operators of the media industry. As for the difficulty in setting the yardstick, it is often resolved with the yardstick set by the consensus of the majority. It is reasonable for the individuals to agree to the values of the majority as ‘the will of all’ as noted by John Jacque Rousseau is the social norm to be respected and accepted if one chooses to live in the society that advocates this value. Moreover, if we examine the complexity of the influence the mass media would impose on the modern society and various phenomenon that occurs in this era, we will demand the imposition of censorship to prevent such negative development.

One such complication that demands the imposition of censorship is the commonality of vices and morally degrading behaviours seen in our society made prevalent by the use of internet. Pornography and internet gaming has intoxicated the minds of many, especially the youths who are immature and are easily susceptible to temptations of undesirable values. Without censorship to regulate the accessibility of this information, the youths are likely to get addicted to the vices and fall preys to syndicate crimes as internet gaming are appealing to the young people. In a recent article in the Strait Times, there are reports of syndicate criminals in China using internet as a way to get youngsters to get addicted to gambling and made them indebted to loan-sharking activities subsequently. Thus, the need to stamp out rampant rise of syndicate crime and its adverse impact on youth would make censorship increasingly necessary.

The imposition of censorship is also deemed necessary when we consider the negative impact on social harmony and stability if freedom of speech is not made accountable. Deleterious and offensive remarks are often made through new media technology like facebook, tweeters and blogs as they have made it very accessible and convenient for individuals to voice out their opinions. On a bright side, this technological development in the media industry empowers the individuals but on a dark side, the technological empowerment is abused as individuals are not held accountable for biased and defaming remarks. Consequently, we can observe the rise of many cyber bullies among the young users of the internet whose behaviours are considered anti-social. From a wider observation, we can see how these remarks can incite racial tensions as seen by a recent Youtube upload of the racist remark made by a student in Berkeley. The charges brought against three youngsters for their racist remarks over the internet under the Sedition Act by the courts in Singapore show how serious the government in regulation of freedom of speech as there is disastrous impact on the social fabrics of the nation, given its vulnerability as a multicultural society.

But the most pressing reason for the imposition of censorship is seen from how the new media technology is being used for ill political motive that threatens the political stability and security of the nations. Many of the infamous terrorist groups like Jemaah Islamiyah and Al-Qaeda are known to exploit the use of internet to spread their cause and recruit new members to implement their terrorist acts. With the use of modern media technology, these groups are able to indoctrinate their values in their new recruits as the exposure is invasive and persistent through this personal and private form of interaction. From the arrest of the JI cell group in Singapore, it is noted that some of these members are recruited through the internet. Besides this perilous threat, the recent remarks made about the new People’s Action Party candidates, Tin Pei Ling over the new media platforms has drawn concerns from Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong that this will hurt the political leadership renewal for the country in the future. Thus, from both the imminent and future point of view, the lack of censorship can create dire consequence on the political front of a nation.

Conclusion

In retrospect, we can understand why censorship is not desired by the liberals but the complex development in the contemporary era will demand us to ponder over the need of censorship. These adverse developments that are realistically tearing down our social fabrics, undermining the civility and threatening our political security and stability and it is only through an effective regulation of the modern media technology that will ensure us from succumbing to the adverse impacts. However, there is a need to develop an effective institution to perform this imperative task to ensure that the new media is made accountable to reap the benefit of freedom of speech without making it an adversary of the society.

Experience academic progression

Sign up now at General Paper Tuition!

What other GP issues do we discuss?

On this issue on censorship, we also explore other concerns on this topic of censorship from a wider scope of discussion to make your understanding of the issue. Students may want to find out how censorship is related to the regulation of press, how it will affect the modern society, how censorship is related to fake news, the role of censorship in Singapore and the relationship of censorship to freedom of speech and fake news.

Commentary Features

Rate our GP Tuition programme and give us your take on whether censorship is necessary in our modern society? Thank you!

Reviews System WIDGET PACK